Introduction — Most people encounter Tantra through yoga studios or wellness culture, but the two traditions have distinct roots, goals, and methods. Clear up the confusion here. What Tantra and yoga share — Common heritage in the Vedic and Shaivite traditions; use of breath, body, and mantra; the goal of liberation (moksha). Where they diverge
- Goal orientation: Classical yoga (Patanjali) seeks to still the mind and transcend the body. Tantra embraces the body as a vehicle for awakening.
- View of desire: Yoga often treats desire as an obstacle. Tantra sees desire — including sexual and sensory desire — as raw energy to be redirected, not suppressed.
- Ritual vs. renunciation: Yoga leans toward renunciation (vairagya). Tantra incorporates ritual, deity worship, and the full spectrum of human experience.
Tantra vs. Buddhism
- Vajrayana (Tibetan) Buddhism borrowed heavily from Tantra but reframed deities as mental projections rather than cosmic realities.
- Tantra holds the world as real and divine; certain Buddhist schools treat it as empty (shunyata).
Tantra vs. Advaita Vedanta
- Vedanta says the world is maya (illusion) to be seen through. Tantra says the world is the divine play of consciousness — real, sacred, to be inhabited fully.
- Key contrast: transcendence vs. immanence.
Tantra vs. neo-Tantra (modern Western Tantra)
- Traditional Tantra is a vast philosophical and ritual system; neo-Tantra narrows it primarily to sexuality and relationship.
- Neither is wrong — but practitioners benefit from knowing which lineage they’re drawing from.
Why the distinctions matter for your practice — Knowing the philosophy behind the method helps you use it more consciously and avoid mixing traditions in ways that dilute both. Conclusion — Tantra doesn’t ask you to renounce life. It asks you to meet life so fully that every moment becomes an act of recognition.
This therapist author listing currently not available
