These two words get used as though they point at the same thing. They don’t, and conflating them sends people down a road that gets narrower the further they go.
The distinction is simple to state. Arousal is how activated you are. Aliveness is how much you can feel.
They are not two ends of one scale. They’re separate dials, and once you can see them as separate, a whole category of problem becomes legible.
Arousal isn’t what you think it is
Start by decoupling the word from its usual association.
In physiological terms, arousal just means activation. Heart rate up, alertness up, the system mobilised. It’s the axis that runs from asleep to wide awake to agitated, and it’s the same axis regardless of what put you on it.
Anxiety is high arousal. So is anger. So is excitement, panic, the third coffee of the morning, a deadline, an argument, scrolling something upsetting at midnight. All high arousal. Entirely different experiences, identical activation.
So arousal tells you how much energy is moving. It tells you nothing about whether you’re actually experiencing anything.
Aliveness is the other dial
Aliveness is receptivity — how much sensation is getting through and registering.
You can measure it by how much has to happen before you notice something. A person high in aliveness feels the temperature change when they walk into a room, notices their own breathing shift during a conversation, registers the texture of what they’re eating. A person low in aliveness needs considerably more input before anything lands at all.
And crucially, aliveness moves independently of arousal. All four combinations exist:
High arousal, low aliveness. The most common state in modern life. Doomscrolling at 1am. A frantic day that passes in a blur. Wired, exhausted, and afterwards unable to say what any of it actually felt like. Enormous activation, almost no experience.
Low arousal, low aliveness. Numbness. Flat, dulled, waiting for something to happen.
High arousal, high aliveness. Intensity you can actually feel. Rare, and usually memorable.
Low arousal, high aliveness. Lying in the sun with nothing to do. Quiet company with someone you trust. Very little happening, and all of it perceptible. Most people have had this and assume it was luck rather than a state they could cultivate.
Why the confusion causes damage
Here’s the trap, and it’s a closing one.
When aliveness drops, things stop registering. That’s uncomfortable — being unable to feel much is its own kind of distress. And there’s an obvious remedy available: if the signal isn’t getting through, increase the signal.
So people turn arousal up. More stimulation, more novelty, more intensity, more conflict. And it works, briefly. You feel something.
But nothing about that addresses the low aliveness, and the escalation itself dulls you further. So the threshold rises. What worked last month doesn’t now. You need more, then more again.
This is the engine behind a lot of things that look unrelated: needing a fight to feel close to a partner, an appetite for increasingly extreme material, chasing novelty in relationships, an inability to enjoy a quiet evening, the sense that nothing quite does it anymore.
It’s a burnt palate. If you’ve damaged your ability to taste, adding more chilli appears to solve the problem — you can feel the food again. But the chilli is what damaged the palate, and each round makes the next round necessary. The solution is never more chilli. It’s repair, and the interval before things taste like anything again is genuinely unpleasant.
Numbness doesn’t discriminate
One more thing worth knowing, because it explains why this matters beyond pleasure.
Low aliveness is usually protective in origin. Something was too much to feel, and the system turned down its sensitivity. That was a reasonable adaptation at the time.
But the dial isn’t selective. There’s no setting that dampens grief while leaving joy intact. Whatever reduces your capacity to feel pain reduces your capacity to feel everything, by the same amount. People who’ve successfully stopped feeling something difficult usually discover, some years later, that they’ve also stopped being moved by music, by their children, by a good day.
That’s the actual cost, and it’s rarely the one people think they’re paying.
What this practice does about it
Everything in tantric work points at the second dial, not the first.
This is why so much of it looks underwhelming from outside. Nothing is being amplified. Nothing intense is being manufactured. The work is slow attention on ordinary sensation, repeated, which gradually restores sensitivity that was turned down.
And as aliveness comes back, something counterintuitive happens: you need less. Smaller things register. An ordinary morning becomes perceptible again. The escalation you’d been trapped in simply becomes unnecessary, rather than being resisted through willpower.
That’s the whole move. Don’t increase the broadcast. Repair the receiver.
Try it — five minutes
Choose a moment today when your arousal is high. After a stretch of screen time is ideal, because it’s the clearest case.
Put the device down. Sit still. Don’t put anything else on. Set five minutes.
For the first two or three, expect it to feel bad — restless, itchy, an urge to reach for something. That’s arousal with nothing to attach to, and it’s uncomfortable rather than dangerous.
Somewhere in the last minute or two, small things usually start coming back. The temperature of your hands. The weight of your feet. Sounds in the room you hadn’t been hearing. Nothing dramatic.
That returning detail is aliveness coming back online as arousal falls. It was there the whole time; the noise was simply louder than the signal.
Once you’ve felt that happen even once, you’ll recognise the difference between the two dials for the rest of your life — and you’ll notice how often you’ve been reaching for the wrong one.
This therapist author listing currently not available
